NEW JERSEY

v.

NEW YORK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• New Jersey v. NEW York, 345 U.S. 369 (U.S. 1953)
  …er paragraph 6 of the 1931 decree for leave to file its petition to modify the decree by providing for diversion of additional quantities of water and for changes in the prescribed formula for releasing water during low flow. The motion was granted. 343 U. S. 974. New Jersey and Pennsylvania filed answers opposing the proposed modifications, and the whole matter was referred to a Special Master. Ibid. [*372] On December 13, 1952, the City of Philadelphia filed this motion for leave to intervene. The petition…
• McCLANAHAN v. State OF La., 399 F.2d 695 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …n appeal or otherwise unless the case is within § 1443. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1447(d). Section 1447(d) is jurisdictional. Westwood Dev. Co. v. Higley, 266 F. 2d 555 (5th Cir. 1959); Lewis v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., 194 F. 2d 1005 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 974, 72 S.Ct. 1083, 96 L.Ed. 1368 (1952). It means exactly what it says. 1A Moore, Federal Practice, § 0.169 [2.-1], at 1452-1453 (2d ed. 1965). Having examined the record it is clear this is not a § 1443 case, either in [*696] the historical sense or…