HALLIDAY, ADMINISTRATRIX,
v.
UNION PROPERTIES, INC. ET AL.
HALLIDAY, ADMINISTRATRIX,
UNION PROPERTIES, INC. ET AL.
344 U.S. 802
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walker v. Honorable E. Randolph Bentley, 660 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…er of the court. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1985); see also Fernandez v. Kellner, 55 So. 2d 793 (Fla.1951) (court’s power and authority to punish by contempt a willful violation of an injunction cannot be questioned), appeal dismissed, 344 U.S. 802, 73 S.Ct. 40, 97 L.Ed. 625 (1952). CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SECTION U1.30(8)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.19U) We are mindful, however, of the basic principles of statutory analysis that we are to presume that the legislature intended to enact a c…
-
City OF Safety Harbor v. KOS Corp., 598 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…amendment as substantial was arbitrary and not in good faith. It is true, as KOS argues, that a court’s determination that one party is in contempt will not be set aside lightly. See Fernandez v. Kellner, 55 So. 2d 793 (Fla.1951), appeal dismissed, 344 U.S. 802, 73 S.Ct. 40, 97 L.Ed. 625 (1952). In this case, however, the evidence cannot support the circuit court’s finding that the City’s classification of the proposed amendment as substantial was arbitrary and not in good faith. In reviewing the transcr…