BROOKS TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
BROOKS TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
344 U.S. 804
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chairman of United States Mar. Comm'n v. Cal. E. Line, Inc., 204 F.2d 398 (D.C. Cir. 1953)…U.S. 631, 69 S.Ct. 762, 93. L.Ed. 931; Snyder v. Buck,, 1950, 340 U.S. 15, 20-21, 71 S.Ct. 93, 95 L.Ed. 15; United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 1950, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36; and McGrath v. National Association of Manufacturers, 1952, 344 U.S. 804, 73 S.Ct. 31. . Cf. Defense Supplies Corp, v. Lawrence Warehouse Co., supra, 336 U.S. at pages 636-637, 69 S.Ct. at page 764r “The statute states categorically that ‘no action shall abate.’ * * * If Congress states that no action shall abate, we fa…