ARIZONA

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nixon v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, 487 F.2d 700 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …6, 280 F. 2d 654 (1960). . 410 U.S. 73, 93, 93 S.Ct. 827, 35 L.Ed.2d 119 (1973). . See text at notes 92-97 infra. . 343 U.S. 579, 72 S.Ct. 863, 96 L.Ed. 1153 (1952). . In Land v. Dollar, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 38, 190 F. 2d 623 (1951), vacated as moot, 344 U.S. 806, 73 S.Ct. 7, 97 L.Ed. 628 (1952), as well, it was clear that the court realized that its order countered the executive will of the President. The Land court acknowledged that the President had directed the cabinet officials to disregard the initial…
• In re the Attorney Gen. OF the United States v. The Attorney Gen., 596 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …same prerogatives that they accord to the President himself. See Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 165-66, 170-71, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803); Sawyer v. Dollar, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 38, 48-49, 53-54, 190 F. 2d 623, 633-34, 638-39 (1951), vacated as moot, 344 U.S. 806, 73 S.Ct. 7, 97 L.Ed. 628 (1952); Bank Line, Ltd. v. United States, 163 F. 2d 133, 138 (2d Cir. 1947) (Augustus N. Hand, J.) (“It has been the policy of the American as well as of the English courts to treat the government when appearing as a litiga…
• King v. The United States, 390 F.2d 894 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., concurring); Land v. Dollar, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 311, 190 F. 2d 366, 623, cert. granted, 341 U.S. 737, 71 S.Ct. 987, 95 L.Ed. 1331 (1951) (per curiam opinion), cert, dismissed on motion of petitioner, 344 U.S. 806, 73 S.Ct. 7, 97 L.Ed. [*906] 628 (1952). Compare State of Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wall. 475, 500-501, 18 L.Ed. 437 (1866). The Senate Judiciary Committee recognized this difference when it supported the passage of the federal Act with the observa…