UNITED STATES

v.

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.; AND COUNTY OF MINERAL, NEVADA, V. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1953)
  …nfluence choice of law in maritime tort cases. Sonnesen v. Panama Transport Co., 298 N. Y. 262, 82 N. E. 2d 569. Such a conflict can arise because Jones Act suits may be brought in state as well as federal courts. Engel v. Davenport, 271 U. S. 33. 344 U. S. 810. See Plamals v. Pinar Del Rio, 277 U. S. 151. Cheatham and Reese, Choice of the Applicable Law, 52 Col. L. Rev. 959, 961, dealing with state statutes, puts the problem in this fashion: “There is one rule or policy which, wherever applicable, take…
• United States v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n of Cal., 345 U.S. 295 (U.S. 1953)
  …se approved by the Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F. 2d 206. As a federal question concerning the applicability of Part II of the Act was raised, certiorari was granted, 344 U. S. 810, to bring the record here from the state proceedings under 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (3). I. Federal authority, which we think obtains, is asserted under Part II of the Federal Power Act. This applies “to the transmission of electric energy in interstat…