STEIN

v.

NEW YORK; WISSNER V. NEW YORK; AND COOPER V. NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• The Div. OF Bev. of the State of Fla. v. Foremost-McKESSON, Inc., 330 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1976)
  …on June 3, 1947. If this inadvertent omission is not supplied, the Division maintains, statutory changes intended to strengthen the Division’s hand in suppressing the “tied house” evil, see Pickerill v. Schott, 55 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 1951), cert. den., 344 U.S. 815, 73 S.Ct. 9, 97 L.Ed. 634 (1952), will have had the contrary effect of making possible further integration of producers and distributors. The evil which the amendments were intended to suppress would thus be fostered. A grandfather clause of this ki…
• Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Schenck Co., 662 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …outlets and to remove the retail dealer in intoxicating liquors from financial or business obligations to the wholesaler, with the exception of ordinary commercial credit for liquors sold. Pickerill v. Schott, 55 So. 2d 716 (Fla.1951), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 815, 73 S.Ct. 9, 97 L.Ed. 634 (1952), quoting 48 C. J.S. Intoxicating Liquors, § 197. See also Hunter v. McKnight, 86 So. 2d 434 (Fla.1956). As further explained in Musleh v. Fulton Distributing Co. of Florida, 254 So. 2d 815, 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971):…
• Stein v. New York, 346 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1953)
  …It is first-degree murder and carries a mandatory death sentence unless the jury recommends life imprisonment. New York Penal Law, §§ 1044 (2), 1045, 1045-a. No such recommendation was made here. People v. Cooper, 303 N. Y. 856, 104 N. E. 2d 917. 344 U. S. 815. The defense argued that Waterbury’s recollection was inaccurate and that he had only 25% vision in one eye. The defense says that this constitutes a coerced confession— Stein having made the statement in police custody. It was not a confession of…