SCHAEFER

v.

MACRI ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …e Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and involved a statute which did not authorize consolidation of counts involving different defendants. (Id. 636, 637, 721) It was distinguished in Ross v. United States, 197 F. 2d 660 (C.A. 6, 1952) cert. denied 344 U.S. 832, 73 S.Ct. 40, 97 L.Ed. 648. Rule 8(b) authorizes joinder of defendants— “ * * * if they are alleged to have participated * * * in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses.” “[They] may be charged in one or more…
• Janzen v. Wilber W. Goos and Ivan Gottula, 302 F.2d 421 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …e absence of findings. The trial court made no findings of fact. The determination of citizenship, however, is “a mixed question of law and of fact, but mainly one of fact”. Maple Island Farm v. Bitterling, 8 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 55, 59, cert. den. 344 U.S. 832, 73 S.Ct. 40, 97 L.Ed. 648; Welsh v. American Surety Co. of New York, 5 Cir., 1951, 186 F. 2d 16, 18. Although findings, therefore, would have been helpful, we note that the motions to dismiss were obvious [*424] ly presented under Rule 12(b), F.R.C…
• United States v. Gus Saunders, 325 F.2d 840 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …he government. American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 147 F. 2d 93, (C.C.A. 6), affirmed 328 U.S. 781, 66 S.Ct. 1125, 90 L.Ed. 1575; Sharp v. United States, 195 F. 2d 997 (C.C.A.6); Ross v. United [*842] States, 197 F. 2d 660 (C.C.A.6), cert. denied 344 U.S. 832, 73 S.Ct. 40, 97 L.Ed. 648. The Appellate Court’s function in this respect is the same both in cases tried by a jury and those tried by the Court upon waiver of jury trial. Jelaza v. United States, 179 F. 2d 202 (C.C.A. 4, 1950). With respect to th…