JAROSZEWSKI

v.

CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. OF NEW JERSEY

Citator

Cited By

• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …U. S. 853. Moleton v. Union Pacific R. Co., 340 U. S. 932. Healy v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 340 U. S. 935. Ottley v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 340 U. S. 948. Craven v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 340 U. S. 952. Jaroszewski v. Central R. Co., 344 U. S. 839. Creamer v. Ogden Union R. & Depot Co., 344 U. S. 912. Frizzell v. Wabash R. Co., 344 U. S. 934. Gill v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 346 U. S. 816. Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 346 U. S. 838. Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern R. Co., 346 U. S.…
• Orin Thomas Grier v. Dep't OF Health & Human Servs., 750 F.2d 944 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …without success by employees whose retention rights the statutes curtailed. Finch v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 1 (1967) (citing Elder v. Brannan, 341 U.S. 277, 71 S.Ct. 685, 95 L.Ed. 939 (1951); Fass v. Gray, 197 F. 2d 587 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 839, 73 S.Ct. 39, 97 L.Ed. 653 (1952); Leeds v. Rossell, 101 F.Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y.1951)). The Finch court said: There would seem to be no doubt that in enacting section 861 originally the Congress was made fully aware of a long [*947] standing policy o…
• Born v. Allen, 291 F.2d 345 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …efining terms used in the Act include: Elder v. Brannan, 1951, 341 U.S. 277, 282-285, 71 S.Ct. 685, 95 L.Ed. 939; Kirkpatrick v. Gray, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 138, 198 F. 2d 533; Fass v. Gray, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 28, 197 F. 2d 587, certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 839, 73 S.Ct. 39, 97 L.Ed. 653. . Although the appellee made this argument before the Commission, he did not renew it in this court, nor, so far as we can tell from the record before us, in the District Court. . “If there were no limit upon the length…