WEST COAST MEAT CO.
v.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION
WEST COAST MEAT CO.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION
344 U.S. 839
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Orin Thomas Grier v. Dep't OF Health & Human Servs., 750 F.2d 944 (Fed. Cir. 1984)…without success by employees whose retention rights the statutes curtailed. Finch v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 1 (1967) (citing Elder v. Brannan, 341 U.S. 277, 71 S.Ct. 685, 95 L.Ed. 939 (1951); Fass v. Gray, 197 F. 2d 587 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 839, 73 S.Ct. 39, 97 L.Ed. 653 (1952); Leeds v. Rossell, 101 F.Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y.1951)). The Finch court said: There would seem to be no doubt that in enacting section 861 originally the Congress was made fully aware of a long [*947] standing policy o…
-
Reconstr. Fin. Corp. v. Langham, 208 F.2d 556 (6th Cir. 1953)…Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290, 20 S.Ct. 574, 44 L.Ed. 774; Carter v. Forrestal, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 53, 175 F. 2d 364, cer-tiorari denied 338 U.S. 832, 70 S.Ct. 47, 94 L.Ed. 507; Fass v. Gray, 91 U.S.App. D.C. 28, 197 F. 2d 587, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 839, 73 S.Ct. 39; Angilly v. United States, 2 Cir., 199 F. 2d 642. In our judgment, none of these points made by appellant is well taken. Section 12 of the Veterans’ Preference Act reads, in part, as follows: “In any reduction in personnel in any civil…