HICKS

v.

REID, SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Herbert Sperling v. Fitzpatrick, 426 F.2d 1161 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …s contained on it, see note 1, supra, the conditions apply whether he signs the form or not. See, e. g., Welch v. Taylor, 292 F. 2d 481, 482 (10th Cir. 1961) ; Hicks v. Reid, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 109, 194 F. 2d 327, 329 (mandatory release), cert, denied, 344 U.S. 840, 73 S.Ct. 51, 97 L. Ed. 653 (1952) ; United States ex rel. Ostin v. Warden, 296 F.Supp. 1135 (S.D. N.Y.1969). Arguably, the releasee consents by leaving the prison. More practically, the conditions may be viewed as reasonable incidents to parole sta…
• Penagaricano v. Allen Corp., 267 F.2d 550 (1st Cir. 1959)
  …y jurisdiction under § 41 of the Organic Act of 1917 popularly called the “Jones Act,” 39 Stat. 965, as amended, 62 Stat. 989, 48 U.S.C.A. § 863, is abundantly clear. See Cepero v. Pan American Airways, 1 Cir., 1952, 195 F. 2d 453, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 840, 73 S.Ct. 50, 97 L.Ed. 653. Second. While it is well established that “Puerto Rico cannot be sued without its consent,” Bonet (Sancho) v. Yabucoa [*554] Sugar Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 505, 506, 59 S.Ct. 626, 627, 83 L.Ed. 946, we believe that this is no…