POLK

v.

TEETS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Monroe Auto Equip. Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Supply Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …he evidence is clear the judge may direct a. verdict or enter a summary judgment. Klein v. Burns Mfg. Co., supra; Berkeley Pump Co. v. Jacuzzi Bros., 214 F. 2d 785 (C.A. 9) ; Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 195 F. 2d 971 (C.A. 3), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 844, 73 S.Ct. 61, 97 L.Ed. 657; Walker v. General Motors-Corp., 225 F.Supp. 350 (N.D.Cal.). Thus the question posed on this appeal is whether “the evidence is such that without weighing the credibility of the witnesses there can be but one reasonable c…
• Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H. G. Salzman, Inc., 302 F.2d 614 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …8 U.S.C. . A jury in a patent case is not free to treat invention as a concept broad enough to include any discovery or novelty which may impress the jurors favorably. Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 195 F. 2d 971, 973 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 844, 73 S.Ct. 61, 97 L.Ed. 657 (1952). Any finding of invention by a jury must be consistent with the standards developed by the courts. If the trial court’s application of defining principles reveals a clear cut case of lack of invention, it must ent…
• Flour City Architectural Metals v. Alpana Aluminum Prods., Inc., 454 F.2d 98 (8th Cir. 1972)
  …U.S. 1076, 90 S.Ct. 1518, 25 L.Ed.2d 811 (1970). Third Circuit: Pre-Graham, this circuit determined the ultimate question of “invention” or nonobviousness to be one of law. Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 195 F. 2d 971 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 344 U.S. 844, 73 S.Ct. 61, 97 L.Ed. 657 (1952). Fifth Circuit: 7?. [/., National Athletic Supply Corp. v. Tone-O-Matic Products, Inc., 421 F. 2d 407 (5th Cir. 1970); Kiva Corp. v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., 412 F. 2d 546 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 927, 90 S…