UNITED STATES
v.
EXCEL PACKING CO., INC.; UNITED STATES V. BROWN ET AL.; AND UNITED STATES V. EXCEL PACKING CO., INC. ET AL.

U.S. | 1952-10-20
Nos. 153; No. 154; Nos. 155, 156 and 157
344 U.S. 851 Supreme Court of the United States (1952) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ex parte Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., 225 F.2d 720 (5th Cir. 1955)
    …ansfer appeals were taken of which disposition is made by a separate opinion filed this day. 5 Cir., 225 F. 2d 718. The orders of transfer were interlocutory and not appealable. Crummer Co. v. Du Pont, 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 468, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 851, 856, 73 S.Ct. 91, 97, 97 L.Ed. 662, 665. Pfizer, correctly surmising that the appeals would be dismissed, filed with this Court a Motion for Leave to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus directing Judge Sloan to vacate his orders of transfer. In…
  • …ntends that the defendants failed to make the showing required for a transfer under § 1404(a); and that the Court should have enjoined the prosecution of the New York actions. In Crummer Co. v. DuPont, 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 468, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 851, 856, 73 S.Ct. 91, 97, 97 L.Ed. 662, 665, this Court held that an order made pursuant to § 1404(a) transferring a cause to another District Court was interlocutory and not appealable. Pfizer seeks to avoid the impact of this precedent by urging that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw