REED
v.
TEXAS
REED
TEXAS
344 U.S. 851
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ex parte Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., 225 F.2d 720 (5th Cir. 1955)…ansfer appeals were taken of which disposition is made by a separate opinion filed this day. 5 Cir., 225 F. 2d 718. The orders of transfer were interlocutory and not appealable. Crummer Co. v. Du Pont, 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 468, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 851, 856, 73 S.Ct. 91, 97, 97 L.Ed. 662, 665. Pfizer, correctly surmising that the appeals would be dismissed, filed with this Court a Motion for Leave to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus directing Judge Sloan to vacate his orders of transfer. In…
-
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. v. Olin Mathieson Chem. Corp., 225 F.2d 718 (5th Cir. 1955)…ntends that the defendants failed to make the showing required for a transfer under § 1404(a); and that the Court should have enjoined the prosecution of the New York actions. In Crummer Co. v. DuPont, 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 468, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 851, 856, 73 S.Ct. 91, 97, 97 L.Ed. 662, 665, this Court held that an order made pursuant to § 1404(a) transferring a cause to another District Court was interlocutory and not appealable. Pfizer seeks to avoid the impact of this precedent by urging that…