HOLLAND COMPANY

v.

AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Silver v. N.Y. Stock Exch., 373 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1963)
  …y action by a registered securities• association (i. e., by the NASD), §§ 15A (g), 15A (h), 25(a), 15 U. S. C. §§78o-3(g), 78o-3 (h), 78y (a); see R. H. Johnson & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm’n, 198 F. 2d 690 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 344 U. S. 855, a different case would arise concerning exemption from the operation of laws designed to prevent anticompetitive activity, an issue we do not decide today. Although the recently issued first segment of the Report of the Special'Study of Securities…
• Hetty FEY v. Walston & Co., Inc., 493 F.2d 1036 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …e question of liability under the general rules of agency and then dealt with Section 10(b) liability by virtue of the federal controlling person rule. . See R. H. Johnson & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Com’n, 198 F. 2d 690 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 855, 73 S.Ct. 94, 97 L.Ed. 664 (1952) ; and Norris & Hirshberg v. Securities & Exchange Com’n, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 268, 177 F. 2d 228 (1949), which recognize that the mere existence of remedial provisions in the Securities Acts does not foreclose the applic…
• Acker v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 258 F.2d 568 (6th Cir. 1958)
  …L.Ed. 528; Lincoln Elec. Co. Employees’ Profit-Sharing Trust v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1951, 190 F. 2d 326, 330; Langstaff v. Lucas, supra, 9 F. 2d at pages 692-693; see United States v. Abrams, 6 Cir., 197 [*577] F. 2d 805, certiorari denied, 1952, 344 U.S. 855, 73 S.Ct. 93, 97 L.Ed. 664.] “The secretary of the treasury cannot by his regulations alter or amend a revenue law.” [Morrill v. Jones, 1882, 106 U.S. 466, 467, 1 S.Ct. 423, 424, 27 L.Ed. 267.] Each of the petitions for rehearing is denied.…