GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CO. ET AL.

v.

LEAHY, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGUIRE, 512 F.2d 918 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …neral Motors Corp., 263 F.Supp. 17, 23 (D.Del.1967); Gulf Research & Development Co. v. Schlumberger Well Sur. Corp., 98 F.Supp. 198 (D.Del.1951) mandamus denied sub nom. Gulf Research & Development Co. v. Leahy, 193 F. 2d 302 (3d Cir. 1951), aff’d, 344 U.S. 861, 73 S.Ct. 102, 97 L.Ed. 668 (1952); Rinaldi v. The Elizabeth Bakke, 107 F.Supp. 975 (N.D.Cal.1952). Cf. Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335, 80 S.Ct. 1084, 4 L.Ed.2d 1254 (1960). Adequate and orderly review therefore requires that physical transfer be d…
• A. Olinick & Sons v. Dempster Bros., Inc., 365 F.2d 439 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …n R’y v. Hyde, supra, and holding that Court of Appeals could review on petition for mandamus whether the action of the District Court was arbitrary); Gulf Research & Dev. Co. v. Harrison, 185 F. 2d 457, 459 (9th Cir.1950), aff’d by a divided court, 344 U.S. 861, 73 S.Ct. 102, 97 L.Ed. 668 (1952) (issuance only in “extraordinary circumstances”); Houston Fearless Corp. v. Teter, 318 F. 2d 822, 828 (10th Cir.1963). . See generally, 1 Moore, Federal Practice ¶[ 0.147 (2d ed. 1964); Kitch, Section 1404(a) of th…
• Hayman Cash Register Co. v. Honorable H. Lee Sarokin, 669 F.2d 162 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …text of a motion to retransfer, see Gulf Research & D. Co. v. Schlumberger Well Sur. Corp., 98 F.Supp. 198 (D.Del.), mandamus denied sub nom. Gulf Research & Development Co. v. Le-ahy, 193 F. 2d 302 (3d Cir. 1951), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 344 U.S. 861, 73 S.Ct. 102, 97 L.Ed. 668 (1952). Chief Judge Leahy, the transferee judge, stated in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to retransfer: “It is not only the principle of comity and the fact that Judge Harrison’s [the transferor judge’s] opinion may be…