SPENCER
v.
UNITED STATES
SPENCER
UNITED STATES
344 U.S. 869
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
-
United States v. Mayo Perez, 489 F.2d 51 (5th Cir. 1973)…that allegations by defendants jointly accused that conflicting and antagonistic defenses will be offered at trial do not necessarily require granting a severance. Allen v. United States, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 202 F. 2d 329, cert. denied, 1952, 344 U.S. 869, 73 S.Ct. 112, 97 L.Ed. 674. Even if hostility should appear among the co-defendants or they attempt to cast blame on each other, it does not compel the granting of separate trials. Baker v. United States, 10 Cir., 1964, 329 F. 2d 786, cert. denied,…
-
Rhozier T. Brown, Jr. v. United States, 375 F.2d 310 (D.C. Cir. 1966)…e first place, there was no representation to the judge that Jones wished to call either co-defendant as a witness or that he had any reliable basis for desiring to do so. Cf. Allen v. United States, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 202 F. 2d 329, cert. denied, 344 U.S. 869, 73 S.Ct. 112, 97 L.Ed. 674. In Echeles the trial court was presented strong reasons why Echeles wished to call his co-defendant as a witness. Here, it is true, there is an affidavit filed by Brown prior to trial, accompanying Irby’s motion for seve…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence