NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

v.

GAMBLE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. California, 381 U.S. 139 (U.S. 1965)
  …nd of California, the same seven now in dispute, should be treated as “inland waters” within the meaning of the California opinion and decree, and therefore the property of the State.6 342 U. S. 891. On October 14, 1952, the Master filed his Report, 344 U. S. 872, in which he said he assumed that the test of whether the land in dispute belonged to California depended on whether it was inland water “by (1) any customary, generally recognized rule of international law ... or by (2) effective assertion by the U…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Zborowski, 271 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …onage activities generally, all leads which the jury can obtain to identify those who have at any time been engaged therein are material. See Vetterli v. United States, 9 Cir., 198 F. 2d 291, judgment vacated and case remanded for resentencing 1952, 344 U.S. 872, 73 S.Ct. 175, 97 L.Ed. 675. Zborowski’s testimony was material to the grand jury investigation; his statement that he did not know Jack Soble had a tendency to dissuade the grand jury from making further inquiry into that phase of Zborowski’s N.K.V…
• United States v. Mannie Goldberg, 290 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …value as belongs to any testimonial assertion under the circumstances,” 4 Wigmore, Evidence (3d ed. 1940), pp. 5-6, applies. Hence, as said in Vetterli v. United States, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F. 2d 291, 293, vacated and remanded on other grounds, 1952, 344 U.S. 872, 73 S.Ct. 175, 97 L.Ed. 675, “We do not believe an extra-judicial admission made by an accused is insufficient as corroboration simply because it is such.” With respect to Count II, appellant relies on the statement in Umbria- [*735] co v. United S…