BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION ET AL.
v.
DRISCOLL, GOVERNOR; NONGARD ET AL., TRADING AS KETCHAM & NONGARD, ET AL. V. DRISCOLL, GOVERNOR; AND BELL V. DRISCOLL, GOVERNOR, ET AL.

U.S. | 1952-11-17
Nos. 137; No. 184; No. 188
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
344 U.S. 888 Supreme Court of the United States (1952) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1984)
    …ice employee who is required to eat at his desk or a factory worker who is required to be at his machine is working while eating. (Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin, Nebraska Co., 97 F.Supp. 661 (D.Neb.1951), aff'd 197 F. 2d 981 (C.A. 8, 1952), cert. denied 344 U.S. 888, 73 S.Ct. 183, 97 L.Ed. 687 (1952); Thompson v. Stock & Sons, Inc., 93 F.Supp. 213 (E.D.Mich.1950), aff'd 194 F. 2d 493 (C.A. 6, 1952); Biggs v. Joshua Hendy Corp., 183 F. 2d 515 (C.A. 9, 1950), 187 F. 2d 447 (C.A. 9, 1951); Walling v. Dunbar Transf…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw