DWORSKY ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS FIDELITY FACTORS,

v.

LEICHTER

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Matter of Willis C. Pioch, 235 F.2d 903 (3d Cir. 1956)
  …693. . Dilworth v. Boothe, 5 Cir., 1934, 69 F. 2d 621, 624; Thompson v. Eck, 2 Cir., 1945, 149 F. 2d 631; Tancer v. Wales, 2 Cir., 1946, 156 F. 2d 627, 628. . In re Leichter, 3 Cir., 1952, 197 F. 2d 955, 957, certiorari denied Dworsky v. Leichter, 344 U.S. 914, 73 S.Ct. 336, 97 L.Ed. 705. . Lodi Trust Co. v. Cohn, 3 Cir., 1939, 108 F. 2d 26; McMullin v. Todd, 10 Cir., 1955, 228 F. 2d 139. . Roberts v. W. P. Ford & Sons, 4 Cir., 1948, 169 F. 2d 151; In re Leichter, supra, Note 6; McMullin v. Todd, supra,…
• In re Tully v. Tully, 818 F.2d 106 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …d.2d 197 (1966). In that vein, the statutory right to a discharge should ordinarily be construed liberally in favor of the debtor. Matter of Vickers, 577 F. 2d 683, 687 (10th Cir.1978); In re Leichter, 197 F. 2d 955, 959 (3d Cir.1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 914, 73 S.Ct. 336, 97 L.Ed. 705 (1953); Roberts v. W.P. Ford & Son, Inc., 169 F. 2d 151, 152 (4th Cir.1948). “The reasons for denying a discharge to a bankrupt must be real and substantial, not merely technical and conjectural.” Dilworth v. Boothe, 69 F…
• Coleman v. Alcock, 272 F.2d 618 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …1953, 206 F. 2d 643; Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co., D.C.Md.1952, 101 F.Supp. 842, 845; Detroit Trust Co. v. Schantz, D.C.E.D.Mich.1926, 14 F. 2d 225; cf. First National Bank v. Lake, 4 Cir., 1952, 199 F. 2d 524, certiorari denied, 1953, 344 U.S. 914, 73 S.Ct. 337, 97 L.Ed. 705. The fact that the Trustee did not intervene is of no real moment.8 If it is a suit involving title to property, the Trustee is bound whether he intervenes or not. Theoretically it might be thought that this suggests tha…