ARIZONA

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Maryland v. Louisiana, 451 U.S. 725 (U.S. 1981)
  …intiffs, see supra, at 744 and this page. We have often permitted the United States to intervene in appropriate cases where distinctively federal interests, best presented by the United States itself, are at stake. See, e. g., Arizona v. California, 344 U. S. 919 (1953); Oklahoma v. Texas, 253 U. S. 465 (1920). Third, the Master recommended that we grant the motion of 17 pipeline companies to intervene as plaintiffs. Given that the Tax is directly imposed on the owner of imported gas and that the pipelines…
• Tungsten Mining Corp. v. Dist. 50, 242 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1957)
  …ion was still outstanding” within the meaning of Section 8(b) (4) (C). In United Brick & Clay Workers of America v. Deena Artware, 6 Cir., 1952, 198 F. 2d 637, certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 897, 73 S.Ct. 277, 97 L.Ed. 694, rehearing denied 1953, 344 U.S. 919, 73 S.Ct. 346, 97 L.Ed. 708, the court held that in a suit under Section 303(b) a jury question was presented as to whether picketing by United was against Deena, and the purpose thereof. This “main issue" was “one of the issues involved collaterall…
• Hyatt Chalet Motels, Inc. v. Carpenters Local 1065 & Laborers Local 441, 430 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …des injury to the rights of another. . Since Schatte a number of courts have applied its § 303 ruling. See United Brick & Clay Workers v. Deena Artware, Inc., 6 Cir., 198 F. 2d 637, 640, cert. den. 344 U.S. 897, 73 S.Ct. 277, 97 L.Ed. 694, reh. den. 344 U.S. 919, 73 S.Ct. 346, 97 L.Ed. 708 (1952) ; Banner Mfg. Co. v. United Furn. Workers, D.C., 90 F.Supp. 723 (1950) and others cited by the appellants at page 12 of their brief. The Banner court applied Schatte and noted that the legislative history of secti…