KROSS
v.
CALIFORNIA; CROSS V. TUSTIN ET AL.; NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. MONTANA ET AL.

U.S. | 1953-01-19
Nos. 407; No. 447; No. 455
344 U.S. 923 Supreme Court of the United States (1953) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnston v. United States, 351 U.S. 215 (U.S. 1956)
    …the defendant is outside the State while committing the offense. Comment, 6 Stan. L. Rev. 709. Cf. United States v. Lombardo, 241 U. S. 73, 78; Haas v. Henkel, 216 U. S. 462. See also United States v. Wilson and United States v. Purchasing Corp., 344 U. S. 923, where in an interpretation of a statutory duty to “forward” a report of shipments under the Tobacco Tax Act, 63 Stat. 884, we approved the District Court judgment that venue for prosecution was in the district of the shipper rather than the distric…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw