SIG ELLINGSON & CO.

v.

BUTENBACH, DOING BUSINESS AS GARNER SALES CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Westrope, 730 F.2d 729 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …district court to block Overstreet from seeking all possible [*733] relevant evidence to present in his defense of the declaratory judgment action. The Second Circuit stated in Weiss v. United States, 199 F. 2d 454, 455 (2d Cir.1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 934, 73 S.Ct. 504, 97 L.Ed. 718, reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 914, 73 S.Ct. 643, 97 L.Ed. 1348 (1953), that the dismissal of a complaint rendered moot motions filed by the plaintiff to compel a party to submit to further discovery. The Weiss rationale is inap…
• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …S. 935. Ottley v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 340 U. S. 948. Craven v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 340 U. S. 952. Jaroszewski v. Central R. Co., 344 U. S. 839. Creamer v. Ogden Union R. & Depot Co., 344 U. S. 912. Frizzell v. Wabash R. Co., 344 U. S. 934. Gill v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 346 U. S. 816. Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 346 U. S. 838. Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern R. Co., 346 U. S. 867. Shellhammer v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 347 U. S. 990. Keiper v. Northwestern Pacific R. Co.,…
• United States v. Kramel, 234 F.2d 577 (8th Cir. 1956)
  …the time of sale. This court has recently held that the State law governs in a situation like this, Sig Ellingson & Co. v. De Vries, 8 Cir., 199 F. 2d 677 and Sig Ellingson & Co. v. Butenbach, 8 Cir., 199 F. 2d 679, cer-tiorari denied in both cases 344 U.S. 934, [*579] 73 S.Ct. 505, 97 L.Ed. 719; and such is the holding of other courts.1 The applicable law of Missouri is clearly stated in Blackwell v. Laird (Kansas City Court of Appeals), 236 Mo.App. 1217, 163 S.W. 2d 91, followed in Cresswell v. Leftridg…

  ← 1 / 2 →