MAHONEY

v.

BOWLES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Hanna v. Fletcher, 231 F.2d 469 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
  …But since the effect of this principle may be to stifle such beneficence, I would have preferred to rest liability on a broader view set forth in my dissent in Bowles v. Mahoney, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 160, 202 F. 2d 320, 325, certiorari denied, 1953, 344 U.S. 935, 73 S.Ct. 505, 97 L.Ed. 719. According to this view, the realities of modern day urban living require that “in the absence of express provision to the contrary, a landlord who leases property should be held to a continuing obligation to exercise rea…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Whetzel v. Jess Fisher Mgmt. Co., 282 F.2d 943 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …that count and remand with directions to proceed to trial. As to the other counts, we affirm since appellants make no point on appeal with respect to them.16 So ordered. . 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 159, 202 E.2d 320, 323, certiorari denied 1953, 344 U.S. 935, 73 S.Ct. 505, 97 L.Ed. 719. . The lease provided that the lessee would “keep the premises in good order and condition and surrender the same at the expiration of the term herein in the same order in which they are received, usual wear and tew and…
• Landella Kanelos v. Kettler, 406 F.2d 951 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …h v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 199, 204 F. 2d 391, 392, 44 A.L.R.2d 671 (1953); Higashi v. Shifflett, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 302, 195 F. 2d 784 (1952). . Bowles v. Mahoney, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 159, 202 F. 2d 320, 323 (1952), cert. denied 344 U.S. 935, 73 S.Ct. 505, 97 L.Ed. 719 (1953). See also Paratino v. Gildenhorn, 55 App.D.C. 271, 272, 4 F. 2d 938, 939 (1925); Security Sav. & Commercial Bank v. Sullivan, 49 App.D. C. 119, 120, 261 F. 461, 462 (1919). . In the lease, appellant covenanted to…