REDDITT ET AL.

v.

HALE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Barnett v. United AIR Lines, Inc., 738 F.2d 358 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …ly resolved in a prompt manner by an adjustment board. See Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. Sheehan, supra at 94, 99 S.Ct. at 402; Brotherhood of Locomotive Fireman & Enginemen v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 199 F. 2d 384, 385 (5th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 908, 73 S.Ct. 648, 97 L.Ed. 1344 (1953). Hence, the district court would have been [*362] without jurisdiction to review that claim standing alone. However, by styling his suit as a hybrid involving both a contract and a fair representation claim, Barn…
• Alabaugh v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 222 F.2d 861 (4th Cir. 1955)
  …795; Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Ry. Co., 339 U.S. 255; Spires v. Southern R. Co., 4 Cir., 204 F. 2d 453; Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 5 Cir., 199 F. 2d 384, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 908, 73 S.Ct. 648, 97 L.Ed. 1344; Starke v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. Co., 7 Cir., 180 F. 2d 569, 573. And, as said in the case last cited: “Congress having specifically conferred upon' the Adjustment Board the authority to hear and determine pla…
• Reed v. Steamship Yaka, 307 F.2d 203 (3d Cir. 1962)
  …sition of liability on the ship was improper because the accident in suit gave rise to no personal liability. A similar question was carefully considered and decided by this court in Smith v. The Mormacdale, 1952, 198 F. 2d 849, cert. denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 908, 73 S.Ct. 648, 97 L.Ed. 1344. There the owner and operator of a ship employed a stevedore who was injured as a result of the unseaworthiness of the vessel. Since the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act, in establishing a workmen’s compensation s…