LILLIAN PORTERFIELD, JAMES W. HEISTAND AND MALCOLM L. BOTSFORD, APPELLANTS,

v.

C. B. PORTERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MIAMI METAL, INC., AND ALLOYED METALS, INC., MIAMI METAL, INC., AND ALLOYED METALS, INC., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-12-07

No. 65-760

Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

181 So. 2d 18 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)

Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Judge.

This appeal challenges appointment of a receiver. Our opinion and judgment filed this date on the appeal from the final decree (Appeal No. 65-440, 181 So.2d 16) and our order of September 9, 1965, entered in this appeal (No. 65-760), which stayed and in effect set aside the appointment of the receiver, appear determinative of the subject matter of this appeal, making ruling herein unnecessary.

It is so ordered.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Porterfield v. Chauncey B. Porterfield, 181 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

LILLIAN PORTERFIELD, JAMES W. HEISTAND AND MALCOLM L. BOTSFORD, APPELLANTS, v. C. B. PORTERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MIAMI METAL, INC., AND ALLOYED METALS, INC., MIAMI METAL, INC., AND ALLOYED METALS, INC., APPELLEES

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

LILLIAN PORTERFIELD, JAMES W. HEISTAND AND MALCOLM L. BOTSFORD, APPELLANTS,

v.

C. B. PORTERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MIAMI METAL, INC., AND ALLOYED METALS, INC., MIAMI METAL, INC., AND ALLOYED METALS, INC., APPELLEES