PADUA ALARM SYSTEMS, INC.

v.

GENERAL TIME CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Dunn v. ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 370 F.2d 681 (10th Cir. 1966)
  …ion “to the extent that the request is not given in substance,” meets none of the rule’s requirements.2 Hansen v. St. Joseph Fuel Oil Co., 8 Cir., 181 F. 2d 880, 886; Cf. New York, N. H. & H. R. R. v. Zermani, 1 Cir., 200 F. 2d 240, 245, cert. den. 345 U.S. 917, 73 S.Ct. 729, 97 L.Ed. 1351. In fact, we find little distinction between what happened in the case at bar and a so-called general exception to the charge, which is universally condemned. See e. g. Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109, 119, 63 S.Ct. 477…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Solo CUP Co., 237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956)
  …B. v. Good Coal Co., 6 Cir., 110 F. 2d 501; Rapid Roller Co. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 126 F. 2d 452; N. L. R. B. v. Remington Rand, Inc., 2 Cir., 130 F. 2d 919.” See also N. L. R. B. v. J. I. Case Co., 8 Cir., 1952, 198 F. 2d 919, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 917, 73 S.Ct. 729, 97 L.Ed. 1351. The employees might well have exercised better judgment by sending a committee to the management at a more convenient time for making their protest and demand, but we are unable to conclude that ill judgment or lack of…
• United States v. Malinowski, 472 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …pellant urges that support for his contention that “wilfully” requires proof of “evil purpose” or “bad purpose” can be found in a series of decisions of this court, beginning with United States v. Martell, 199 F. 2d 670 (3d Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 917, 73 S.Ct. 728, 97 L.Ed. 1350 (1953). In Martell, the court defined wilfulness, an essential element of the offense of tax evasion, as a state of mind wherein the taxpayer is fully aware of the existence of a tax obligation, coupled with a wrongful i…