MILLER

v.

EIDSON, WARDEN; BERGEN V. WARDEN, MARYLAND STATE PENITENTIARY; BOYDEN V. MCGEE, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.; TARVER V. FAY, WARDEN; DUNCAN V. WARDEN, NEBRASKA STATE PENITENTIARY; WHITE V. HIATT, WARDEN; AND IN RE OPPEDISANO

Citator

Cited By

• Dist. of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., Inc., 346 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1953)
  …on the other counts. 81 A. 2d 249. On cross-appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the 1872 and 1873 Acts were unenforceable and that the entire information should be dismissed. 92 U. S. App. D. C. 34, 203 F. 2d 579. The case is here on certiorari. 345 U. S. 921. I. The history of congressional legislation dealing with the District of Columbia begins with the Act of July 16, 1790, 1 Stat. 130, by which the District was established as the permanent seat of the Government of the United States. We need not r…
• Boston & M. R. R. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 206 F.2d 617 (1st Cir. 1953)
  …rselves, as best we can, into the position of those who uttered the words, and to impute to them how they would have dealt with the concrete occasion.” United States v. Klinger, 2 Cir., 1952, 199 F. 2d 645, 648, affirmed by an equally divided court, 345 U.S. 921, 73 S.Ct. 779. We think that for the reasons already expressed, it is desirable in so far as possible to preserve the integrity of the retirement method and that this requires us to hold with the Tax Court that § 113(b) (1) (C) has no applicability…
• United States v. Klinger, 345 U.S. 979 (U.S. 1953)
  …Certiorari, 345 U. S. 921, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Per Curiam.: The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.…