VAHLBERG

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By

• Lyons v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Gen. Elec. Co., 222 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1955)
  …quantities of documents, all in support of the anti-trust charge. But Judge Bondy denied the motion for an injunction, and his order was unanimously affirmed by this court, 2 Cir., 1953, 201 F. 2d 510 and the Supreme Court denied certiorari, 1953, 345 U.S. 923, 73 S.Ct. 781, 97 L.Ed. 1354. There were numerous moves and counter-moves relating to the discovery proceedings and the upshot was that some 800 pages of depositions were taken and some 6000 documents produced, pursuant to orders of the state court;…
• Studebaker Corp. v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …d simply require the federal court plaintiff to assert an antitrust defense in the state tribunal. See Red Rock Cola Co. v. Red Rock Bottlers, Inc., 195 F. 2d 406 (5 Cir.1952); Lyons v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 201 F. 2d 510 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 923, 73 S.Ct. 781, 97 L.Ed. 1354 (1953). The court in Red Rock expressly disclaimed deciding whether an injunction might not issue in a case where the very act of prosecuting the state proceeding violated federal law, 195 F. 2d at 409 — the situation…
• Pfizer, Inc. v. Elliot L. Richardson, 434 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …the long procedures incident to approval as a “new drug.” Perhaps experience like that in 1941 and 1943 which is recorded in Atlas Powder Co. v. Ewing, 201 F. 2d 347, 351 (3 Cir. 1952), cert. denied sub nom. Glyco Products Co. v. Federal Sec. Adm’r, 345 U.S. 923, 73 S.Ct. 781, 97 L. Ed. 1355 (1953), had caused disillusionment with trial-type hearings on scientific matters. Perhaps there was some other reason now lost in the mists of time, perhaps there was none.10 In any event we must give effect to the res…