CRAMER

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 206 F.2d 392 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …une 27, 1952. C. 477, Title IV, § 403(a) (13), 66 Stat. 279. The provision in the last named Act concerning physical persecution appears in 8 U.S.C.A. §1253(h). . United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 200 F. 2d 288, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 928, 73 S.Ct. 780. . See United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 206 F. 2d 897. . It has frequently been said that denial of a motion for rebearing is not an appealable order. See Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 300 U.S…
• Bruno Blazina v. Bouchard, 286 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. 1961)
  …he applicant and a greater possibility of physical persecution, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reached the same result as we do here. See United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 1952, 200 F. 2d 288, certiorari denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 928, 73 S.Ct. 780, 97 L.Ed. 1358. See also United States ex rel. Miletic v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1952, 108 F.Supp. 719, and Obrenovic v. Pilliod, 7 Cir., 1960, 282 F. 2d 874. Blazina attempts to distinguish t…
• Konstantinos Lena v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 379 F.2d 536 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …hysical” before the word “persecution.” The decision to be made is within the administrative judgment of the Attorney General or his duly authorized delegate. United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 1952, 200 F. 2d 288, 291, cert. den. 345 U.S. 928, 73 S.Ct. 780, 97 L.Ed. 1358. This Court may determine whether there has been an abuse of the discretion reposed in the Attorney General but we do not substitute our own opinion for his so long as his reasons for denying suspension of deportation i…