CHRISTOFFEL
v.
UNITED STATES
CHRISTOFFEL
UNITED STATES
345 U.S. 947
Supreme Court of the United States (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Per_curiam
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for resentencing under 18 U. S. C. (1946 ed.) § 231.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 (U.S. 1957)…ters not connected with this case.” Scanlon v. United States, 223 F. 2d 382, 385-386; Shelton v. United States, 205 F. 2d 806, 814-815; Christoffel v. United States, 91 U. S. App. D. C. 241, 244r-247, 200 F. 2d 734, 737-739, rev’d on other grounds, 345 U. S. 947; D’Aquino v. United States, 192 F. 2d 338, 375; United States v. De Normand, 149 F. 2d 622, 625-626; United States v. Ebeling, 146 F. 2d 254, 257; Little v. United States, 93 F. 2d 401; Arnstein v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 199, 203, 296 F. 946,…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union NO. 1229, 346 U.S. 464 (U.S. 1953)…ng as to the “unlawfulness” of the conduct of the employees which had led to their dis [*471] charge. 91 U. S. App. D. C. 333, 202 F. 2d 186.7 We granted certiorari because of the importance of the case in the administration of the Taft-Hartley Act. 345 U. S. 947. In its essence, the issue is simple. It is whether these employees, whose contracts of employment had expired, were discharged “for cause.” They were discharged solely because, at a critical time in the initiation of the company’s television servi…
-
Coppedge v. United States, 311 F.2d 128 (D.C. Cir. 1962)…testifying against Coppedge. . Fed.R.Crim.P. 26; Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 240-244, 15 S.Ct. 337, 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895); Christoffel v. United States, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 241, 249-250, 200 F. 2d 734, 741-742 (1952), vacated for resentencing, 345 U.S. 947, 73 S.Ct. 868, 97 L.Ed. 1371 (1953); Narum v. United States, 287 F. 2d 897 (Ct.Cl. 1960). Cf. West v. State of Louisiana, 194 U.S. 258, 24 S.Ct. 650, 48 L.Ed. 965 (1904). . The statement at page 15 of appellant’s brief that appellant “sought to int…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence