HALL

v.

SKEEN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 (U.S. 1957)
  …ters not connected with this case.” Scanlon v. United States, 223 F. 2d 382, 385-386; Shelton v. United States, 205 F. 2d 806, 814-815; Christoffel v. United States, 91 U. S. App. D. C. 241, 244r-247, 200 F. 2d 734, 737-739, rev’d on other grounds, 345 U. S. 947; D’Aquino v. United States, 192 F. 2d 338, 375; United States v. De Normand, 149 F. 2d 622, 625-626; United States v. Ebeling, 146 F. 2d 254, 257; Little v. United States, 93 F. 2d 401; Arnstein v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 199, 203, 296 F. 946,…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union NO. 1229, 346 U.S. 464 (U.S. 1953)
  …ng as to the “unlawfulness” of the conduct of the employees which had led to their dis [*471] charge. 91 U. S. App. D. C. 333, 202 F. 2d 186.7 We granted certiorari because of the importance of the case in the administration of the Taft-Hartley Act. 345 U. S. 947. In its essence, the issue is simple. It is whether these employees, whose contracts of employment had expired, were discharged “for cause.” They were discharged solely because, at a critical time in the initiation of the company’s television servi…
• Coppedge v. United States, 311 F.2d 128 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
  …testifying against Coppedge. . Fed.R.Crim.P. 26; Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 240-244, 15 S.Ct. 337, 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895); Christoffel v. United States, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 241, 249-250, 200 F. 2d 734, 741-742 (1952), vacated for resentencing, 345 U.S. 947, 73 S.Ct. 868, 97 L.Ed. 1371 (1953); Narum v. United States, 287 F. 2d 897 (Ct.Cl. 1960). Cf. West v. State of Louisiana, 194 U.S. 258, 24 S.Ct. 650, 48 L.Ed. 965 (1904). . The statement at page 15 of appellant’s brief that appellant “sought to int…