SMITH

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Rogin v. Bensalem Twp. & Stephen J. Kelly, 616 F.2d 680 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …urt, at least as to the state claims, under the doctrine of res judicata. Res judicata is an affirmative defense, Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c), not a question of jurisdiction. Scholla v. Scholla, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 201 F. 2d 211, 213 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 966, 73 S.Ct. 951, 97 L.Ed. 1384 (1953). Because the defendants did not raise the defense in their pleadings, we do not address the issue. See First Nat'l State Bank of New Jersey v. Commonwealth Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n of Norristown, 610 F. 2d 164,…
• Weinstein v. E. Airlines, Inc., 316 F.2d 758 (3d Cir. 1963)
  …ablished that the situs of a tort determines whether or not it is maritime. In order to be maritime it must occur on navigable waters subject to admiralty jurisdiction.”, Forgione v. United States, 202 F. 2d 249, 252-253 (3 Cir.), certiorari denied, 345 U.S. 966, 73 S.Ct. 950, 97 L.Ed. 1384 (1953). “Admiralty jurisdiction extends to every species of tort committed upon the high seas or on navigable waters.”, United States v. Matson Navigation Co., 201 F. 2d 610, 613 (9 Cir. 1953). “It is clearly established…
• Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Warren P. Berry. Appeal of Warren Berry. Appeal of Guillermo Brignoni, 604 F.2d 221 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …V.I.C. § 1051 (1978) might well have been more appropriate. The essence of false imprisonment is an unlawful restraint on another’s freedom. Forgione v. United States, 100 F.Supp. 239, 242 (E.D.Pa.1951), aff’d, 202 F. 2d 249 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 966, 73 S.Ct. 950, 97 L.Ed. 1384 (1955); Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure, § 385 at 750. In State v. Roberts, 286 N.C. 265, 277, 210 S.E. 2d 396, 404 (1974), the Supreme Court of North Carolina held that kidnapping is false imprisonment plus asporta…