SERVE YOURSELF GASOLINE STATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC. ET AL.
v.
BROCK, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.; DELAY ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA
SERVE YOURSELF GASOLINE STATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC. ET AL.
BROCK, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.; DELAY ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA
345 U.S. 980
Supreme Court of the United States (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of California; and
Appeal from the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles, California.
Per Curiam:
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United States, 355 U.S. 554 (U.S. 1958)
-
Benmar Transp. & Leasing Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 623 F.2d 740 (2d Cir. 1980)…uestion of the scope or coverage of a permit which the Commission has issued to a motor carrier, if that question is at all doubtful,” quoting Dart Transit Co. v. I. C. C., 110 F.Supp. 876, 880 (D.Minn.) [*745] (three-judge court), aff’d per curiam, 345 U.S. 980, 73 S.Ct. 1138, 97 L.Ed. 1394 (1953)). Application of Section 209(b) Benmar also contends that the Commission improperly applied the criteria of Section 209(b) because it failed to consider the effect of its decision upon Benmar. Yet Division 1 ex…
-
Dart Transit Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 567 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1977)…n is CQntrolling on the court unless its orders are clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious. Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United States, 355 U.S. 554, 558, 78 S.Ct. 496, 2 L.Ed.2d 484 (1958); Dart Transit Co. v. ICC, 110 F.Supp. 876 (D.Minn.), aff’d 345 U.S. 980, 73 S.Ct. 1138, 97 L.Ed. 1394 (1953); Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United States, 225 F.Supp. 755, 758-59 (D.Or.1963), aff’d 378 U.S. 125, 84 S.Ct. 1657, 12 L.Ed.2d 744 (1964). The Commission’s view of Dart’s permit authority as being one of “inte…