FRANK W. KELLS AND GROWERS LOAN & GUARANTY COMPANY
v.
W. M. DAVIDSON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a foreclosure decree, a confirmation of sale, and a deficiency judgment, finding that the lower court's application of well-settled legal principles to the facts was correct and did not warrant disturbance.
The lower court's findings of fact and conclusions of law were correct and should not be disturbed.
“The Chancellor rendered a careful finding of facts upon which the final decree was predicated.”
Establishes the basis for the lower court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an appeal from a final decree of foreclosure, a subsequent decree confirming the sale, and an allowance of a deficiency judgment. Th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Confirmation Of Sale cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from a final decree of foreclosure, and from the subsequent decree of confirma*243tion of sale and allowance of deficiency judgment. The Chancellor rendered a careful finding of facts upon which the final decree was predicated. The case has been ably briefed and orally argued. But no new questions of law are involved, the decision of the court below being based upon the application of well settled principles to the facts found by the Chancellor. We are convinced that neither these findings, nor the conclusions reached by the Chancellor from the evidence, should be disturbed. No practical purpose would be subserved by a delineation of the facts of the case, nor a restatement of the already settled legal principles applicable thereto. Our conclusion is that this long-drawn-out litigation has been finally and correctly decided by the court below, and the decrees and orders appealed from are accordingly
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.
Buford, J., not participating.