INGRAM, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND COUNTY JUDGE OF CRITTENDEN COUNTY, ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Tank Steamer The Fort Fetterman v. The S.C. State Hwy. Dep't, 261 F.2d 563 (4th Cir. 1958)
  …, vested solely in the Government. Public policy dictates that there shall be no material deviation from the plans and specifications approved by the War Department. As was said in United States v. Ingram, 8 Cir., 203 F. 2d 91, 95, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 995, 73 S.Ct. 1136, 97 L.Ed 1402: “Here, there is neither indication nor ambiguity in the statute as a warrant for any judicial dealing with bridge modification, any more than with bridge erection, as a question of obstruction to navigation * * * Devia…
• In re Gil-Bern Indus., Inc., 526 F.2d 627 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …nstat that it would not have been better that such were disclosed in the notice. See In re Strand Theatre, Inc., S.D.N.Y., 1952, 109 F.Supp. 350, 353, aff’d mem. on opinion below, 2 Cir., 1953, 201 F. 2d 889, cert. denied sub nom., Ratett v. Kaplan, 345 U.S. 995, 73 S.Ct. 1137, 97 L.Ed. 1402.) If there was no such practice, we hold that the prima facie meaning of the notice was counter to a free reopening of the bidding. We, of course, recognize that the court is not bound by contract law to accept the hig…
• Levingston Shipbuilding Co. v. The Honorable Stephen Ailes, 358 F.2d 944 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …v. City of Philadelphia, 3 Wall. 713, 70 U.S. 713, 18 L.Ed. [*946] 96 (1865); State of Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 18 How. 421, 59 U.S. 421, 15 L.Ed. 435 (1855); United States v. Ingram, 203 F. 2d 91 (8th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 995, 73 S.Ct. 1136, 97 L.Ed. 1402 (1953); Sewell v. Arundel Corp., 20 F. 2d 503 (5th Cir. 1927). Affirmed. . 239 F.Supp. 775 (E.D.Tex.1965). . River and Harbor Act of 1962, 76 Stat. 1173, 1175. . Note 2 supra, . U.S. Const, art. I, Sec. 8.…