PICKING ET AL.
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
PICKING ET AL.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
345 U.S. 1000
Supreme Court of the United States (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Solomon v. Cont'l Am. Life Ins. Co., 472 F.2d 1043 (3d Cir. 1973)…ing costs to a successful party pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920(3), since it permits witness fees for such parties. See, e.g., Picking v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 11 F.R.D. 71, 72 (M.D. Pa.1951), appeal dismissed, 201 F. 2d 672 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 1000, 73 S.Ct. 1144, 97 L.Ed. 1406 (1953). In exercising its discretionary transfer power under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) the district court may condition transfer upon appropriate safeguards in the interests of justice. It acted within its authority and juris…
-
Schick v. Reed, 483 F.2d 1266 (D.C. Cir. 1973)…e decisions of the Supreme Court of California in Green v. Gordon, 39 Cal. 2d 230, 246 P. 2d 38, cert. denied, 344 U.S. 886, 73 S.Ct. 187, 97 L.Ed. 686 (1952); and Ex parte Collie, 38 Cal.2d 396, 240 P. 2d 275 (1952), cert. denied, Collie v. Heinze, 345 U.S. 1000, 73 S.Ct. 1145, 97 L.Ed. 1406 (1953). A like result was reached by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Hurt v. Moseley, No. 71-1307, decided in an unreported opinion September 13, 1971. The appellant argues that confinement withou…