WILLIAMS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Elam, 678 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …This court has consistently required that objections to the indictment, such as duplicity, must be raised prior to trial. United States v. Busard, 524 F. 2d 72 (5th Cir. 1975); United States v. Williams, 203 F. 2d 572 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 822, 74 S.Ct. 87, 98 L.Ed. 347 (1953). See also Durland v. United States, 161 U.S. 306, 16 S.Ct. 508, 40 L.Ed. 709 (1896) upon which Rule 12(b) is predicated. Like the trial judge, we find no cause for granting relief from waiver under the provisions o…
• United States v. Grayson, 416 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …ad former jeopardy in the event of further proceedings against him. It charged an offense under the statute. United States v. Debrow, 346 U.S. 374, 74 S.Ct. 113, 98 L.Ed. 92 (1953); United States v. Williams, 5 Cir. 1953, 203 F. 2d 572, cert. denied 346 U.S. 822, 74 S.Ct. 37, 98 L.Ed. 347 (1953); Webb v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 369 F. 2d 530; Wheeler v. United States, 8 Cir. 1963, 317 F. 2d 615; United States v. Accardo, 7 Cir. 1962, 298 F. 2d 133 (involving the same statute, Title 26, U.S. C., Sec. 720…
• United States v. Hajecate, 683 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …the indictment. The ready remedy of a motion for a bill of particulars is available to add specifics beyond those required for the indictment to pass constitutional muster, see United States v. Williams, 203 F. 2d 572, 574 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 822, 74 S.Ct. 37, 98 L.Ed. 347 (1953), although, of course, even a bill of particulars cannot be required to compel revelation of the full theory of the case or all the evidentiary facts, see United States v. Murray, 527 F. 2d 401, 411 (5th Cir. 1976);…