GILL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Smith, 574 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …ed, 403 U.S. 907, 91 S.Ct. 2214, 29 L.Ed.2d 684 (1971); Smayda v. United States, 352 F. 2d 251, 253 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 981, 86 S.Ct. 555, 15 L.Ed.2d 471 (1966); United States v. Gill, 204 F. 2d 740, 742 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 825, 74 S.Ct. 42, 98 L.Ed. 350 (1953). This procedure furthers Congress’ intent that federal prosecutions under the Assimilative Crimes Act should reflect local policies of the various states. More difficult, however, is the question of whether the d…
• Neff v. World Publ'g Co., 349 F.2d 235 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …t al. v. Halpern et al., 3 Cir., 260 F. 2d 590; Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 339 U.S. 827, 831, 70 S.Ct. [*254] 894, 94 L.Ed. 1312; McClellan et al. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., 8 Cir., 204 F. 2d 166, cert. denied, 346 U.S. 825, 74 S.Ct. 43, 98 L.Ed. 350; and Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co., 8 Cir., 139 F. 2d 318, 322. In that portion of the opinion of this court in Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Insulating Tape Company, 8 Cir., 284 F. 2d 478, 483, whi…
• United States v. Milby, 400 F.2d 702 (6th Cir. 1968)
  …odomy may be committed without the element of coercion present in an assault, as where consented to. We think appellant’s argument has been answered by the opinion of Judge Swaim in United States v. Gill, 204 F. 2d 740 (7th Cir. 1953), cert, denied, 346 U.S. 825, 74 S. Ct. 42, 98 L.Ed. 350 (1953), the only case in point discovered by our own research. There also the contention was made that the state law maximum penalty provision for the crime of sodomy should limit the punishment imposable for violation of…