UNITED STATES

v.

ARCADE COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Henderson v. United States, 218 F.2d 14 (6th Cir. 1955)
  …case against the appellant. The inconsistencies, if such they were, were fully developed by appellant on cross-examination, and presented a question of credibility for the jury. Butzman v. United States, 6 Cir., 205 F. 2d 343, 349, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 828, 74 S.Ct. 50. Appellant contends that the District Judge erred in permitting Mrs. Everlina B. Davis, one of the purchasers, to testify without personally determining her mental competency. Counsel stated to the Court that he had been advised that s…
• United States v. Stanford, 589 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …Laboratories, supra, at 571; United States v. Caldwell, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 20, 29, 543 F. 2d 1333, 1342 (1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Butzman v. United States, 205 F. 2d 343, 349-50 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 828, 74 S.Ct. 50, 98 L.Ed. 353 (1953). Furthermore, the defendants’ allegation that the generation of publicity was intentional misconduct, even if true, does not merit a dismissal of these indictments. The purpose of the Sixth Amendment is to secure a…
• United States v. Dahlstrom, 713 F.2d 1423 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …the government could prosecute up to six years from that act. There was no holding in Habig that the government could not prosecute for fraudulent preparation alone. Similarly in Butzman v. United States, 205 F. 2d 343 (6th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 828, 74 S.Ct. 50, 98 L.Ed. 353 (1953), the Sixth Circuit ruled that the statute of limitations ran from the date of filing, not from the date of preparation. The dicta in Butzman that no crime was committed until the application was filed and that no cr…