CLARK

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Gonzalez v. Gonzalez, 413 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …the other, estoppel will apply as to that finding of fact. National Bondholders Corp. v. Seaboard Citizens National Bank, 110 F. 2d 138 (4th Cir. 1940); Livesay Industries, Inc. v. Livesay Window Company, 202 F. 2d 378 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 855, 74 S.Ct. 70, 98 L.Ed. 369 (1953). The ruling in Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, 416 F. 2d 707 (7th Cir. 1969), is persuasive authority for considering this case an exception to the general rule. Diamond Shamrock, as a…
• Scooper Dooper, Inc. v. Kraftco Corp., 494 F.2d 840 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …e finding of fact is made in the first suit which is an essential element in a claim or action subsequently brought by one [co-party] against the other.”) ; Livesay Industries, Inc. v. Livesay Window Co., 202 F. 2d 378, 382 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 346 U.S. 855, 74 S.Ct. 70, 98 L.Ed. 369 (1953) (same). . See Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Lumber-mens Mutual Casualty Co., 416 F. 2d 707 (7th Cir. 1969). . Thus, Professor Moore — a long-standing advocate of the mutuality doctrine as well as of the adversity requ…
• Esmat Zaklama, M.D. v. Mount Sinai Med. Ctr., Gardana & De La Puente, P.A., 906 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …d contingency fee contract and subsequently contest his obligations thereunder. See Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U.S. 680, 691, 15 S.Ct. 555, 559, 39 L.Ed. 578 (1895); Livesay Indus., Inc. v. Livesay Window Co., 202 F. 2d 378, 382 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 855, 74 S.Ct. 70, 98 L.Ed. 369 (1953). AFFIRMED. . A detailed factual account of Zaklama's litigation can be found in Zaklama v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center, 842 F. 2d 291 (11th Cir.1988), and the pertinent subsequent procedure regarding Zak-lama’s quest…