KUGLER

v.

PHILADELPHIA FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Murphy v. Houma Well Serv., 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …lem of defining “child” under federal law. Overwhelmingly, courts declare that in construing the terms “child” or “children” in a federal statute, a court should look to state law.18 In Ellis v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F. 2d 173, cert. denied, 346 U.S. 873, 74 S.Ct. 123, 98 L.Ed. 381, this Circuit had occasion to consider the meaning of the term “child” as used in § 9 of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 909. The facts in Ellis are strikingly similar to those of th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Groessel, 440 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This Court has previously approved similar charges on entrapment. E. g., Eisenhardt v. United States, supra, 406 F. 2d at 451 & n. 4; Demos v. United States, 5 Cir. 1953, 205 F. 2d 596, 599-600 & n. 3, cert. denied, 346 U.S. 873, 74 S.Ct. 123, 98 L.Ed. 382. Groessel’s reliance on Notaro v. United States, 9 Cir. 1966, 363 F. 2d 169, and United States v. Pugliese, 2 Cir. 1965, 346 F. 2d 861, is misplaced. In Notaro the trial judge failed to delineate for the jury which party…
• Odell Clark v. United States, 293 F.2d 445 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …rule. See Meeks v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 259 F. 2d 328; Tomley v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 250 F. 2d 549, certiorari denied 356 U.S. 928, 78 S.Ct. 716, 2 L.Ed.2d 759; Demos v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 205 F. 2d 596, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 873, 74 S.Ct. 123, 98 L.Ed. 382; Thomas v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 189 F. 2d 430; Ansley v. United States, 5 Cir., 1943, 135 F. 2d 207. Because of the absence of the relevant substantial evidence from which the jury could properly determine beyond…