HORTON

v.

SKEEN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Cent. Gulf S.S. Corp. v. Basilio Sambula, 405 F.2d 291 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …ntical factual situations.”4 See Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., S.D.N.Y.1963, 218 F.Supp. 235, 236, aff’d 2 Cir., 327 F. 2d 355; Wheeler v. West India S.S. Co., S.D.N.Y.1951, 103 F.Supp. 631, 633, aff’d 2 Cir., 205 F. 2d [*299] 354, cert. den., 346 U.S. 889, 74 S.Ct. 141, 98 L.Ed. 393; cf. Braen v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Company, 1959, 361 U.S. 129, 80 S.Ct. 247, 4 L.Ed.2d 191. In conclusion, Sambula was “in the service of the ship” when he was injured, and consequently he had a right to receive m…
• Nilsen v. The City OF Moss Point, 674 F.2d 379 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …pyards, Inc. v. The Vessel Thomas E. Cuffe, E.D.La. 1977, 434 F.Supp. 920. . We are aware of a few cases employing laches terminology in denying leave to amend, Wheeler v. West India S.S. Co., 2 Cir., 205 F. 2d 354 (per curiam), cert. denied, 1953, 346 U.S. 889, 74 S.Ct. 141, 98 L.Ed. 393; Perez v. Chutick & Sudakoff, 1970 S.D.N.Y., 50 F.R.D. 1; Tarbert v. Ingraham Co., D.Conn.1960, 190 F.Supp. 402 (alternative holding). Each of those cases held that the movant was guilty of [*389] laches and therefore wou…
• Constantine MacRis v. Sociedad Maritima SAN Nicolas, S.A., 245 F.2d 708 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …cumstances disclosed by the record, the trial court was clearly within its discretion in denying the motion to amend. Simms v. Andrews, 10 Cir., 1941, 118 F. 2d 803, 807; Wheeler v. West India S.S. Co., 2 Cir., 1953, 205 F. 2d 354, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 889, 74 S.Ct. 141, 98 L.Ed. 393; United States v. City of Brookhaven, 5 Cir., 1943, 134 F. 2d 442, 446 1 The denial of the motion to amend was not prejudicial in any event, however, for the simple reason that the evidence failed to show any breach of d…