UNITED STATES EX REL. ACCARDI
v.
SHAUGHNESSY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

U.S. | 1953-11-30
No. 366
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Clark would deny the application without prejudice to an application to proper authority.
346 U.S. 892 Supreme Court of the United States (1953) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Wilson, 578 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1978)
    …2d 88 (1971); United States v. Hatcher, 423 F. 2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1970); Cassady v. United States, 395 F. 2d 205 (5th Cir. 1968); Nunez v. United States, 370 F. 2d 538 (5th Cir. 1967); Shelton v. United States, 205 F. 2d 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 892, 74 S.Ct. 230, 98 L.Ed. 395 (1953); Logan v. United States, 192 F. 2d 388 (5th Cir. 1951). One past application of this doctrine permitted the admission of evidence of a narcotics sale other than the one named in the indictment when the two sales co…
  • United States v. Alf Hill, Jr., 526 F.2d 1019 (10th Cir. 1975)
    …rt. denied, 410 U.S. 970, 93 S.Ct. 1443, 35 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973); United States v. Conder, 423 F. 2d 904 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958, 91 S.Ct. 357, 27 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970); Shelton v. United States, 205 F. 2d 806 (5th Cir.), appeal dismissed, 346 U.S. 892, 74 S.Ct. 230, 98 L.Ed. 395 (1953). Since Faretta, at least one district court has determined that a criminal defendant already represented by counsel has no right to act as her own co-counsel. United States v. Swinton, 400 F.Supp. 805 (S.D.N.Y.1975…
  • Jencks v. United States, 226 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1955)
    ….19 But no such showing was made here, and the court below properly refused to require the Government to produce its file or any part of it for inspection. Cf. Shelton v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 205 F. 2d 806, Petition for certiorari dismissed, 346 U.S. 892, 74 S.Ct. 230, 98 L.Ed. 395. (6) And we are not impressed by the claim of appellant that the court [*553] below, in its charge, did not, as requested by him, warn the jury against acceptance of the testimony of the informers. The court was not boun…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw