TOM WE SHUNG
v.
BROWNELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

U.S. | 1953-12-07
No. 241
Mr. Justice Black would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent.
346 U.S. 906 Supreme Court of the United States (1953) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 98 L. Ed. 405 · 74 S. Ct. 237 · 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1386 · SCDB 1953-029
Cited by 54 cases
Topics
Remand Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.

Mr. Justice Black would re verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent.

Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

  • United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990)
    …per factor, the sentence may not be reviewed on appeal.” United States v. Giraldo, 822 F. 2d 205, 210 (2d Cir.) (citing Gore v. United States, 357 U.S. 386, 393, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 1284, 2 L.Ed.2d 1405 (1958)), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969, 108 S.Ct. 466, 98 L.Ed.2d 405 (1987). 1. The Torres Brothers. The Torres brothers claim that the mandatory life sentence without parole imposed by 21 U.S.C. § 848(b) (Supp. V 1987) is unconstitutional. Since we have vacated their convictions under section 848(b) on another gro…
  • United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535 (2d Cir. 1988)
    …of the jury, and the jury never learned of it. Cf, e.g., United States v. Giraldo, 822 F. 2d 205, 209 (2d Cir.) (no impact on jury where allegedly biased behavior of court took place outside presence of jury), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 466, 98 L.Ed. 2d 405 (1987); United States v. Pisani, 773 F. 2d 397, 403-04 (2d Cir.1985) (same). Moreover, Friedman’s claim that there is “no adequate assurance” that the jury was not exposed to the court’s remark is directly contradicted by the very record that he urg…
  • Song Jook SUH v. Rosenberg, 437 F.2d 1098 (9th Cir. 1971)

Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw