UNITED STATES

v.

ARIZONA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Donovan Edward Ruby v. Secretary OF the United States Navy, 365 F.2d 385 (9th Cir. 1966)
  …rcuit Judge, concurring. I concur in the foregoing. Fundamentally I do not believe in it or in our Firchau case, 345 F. 2d 269, in which I concurred. But to me there is a message by which I must abide in United States v. State of Arizona et al., 346 U.S. 907, 74 S.Ct. 239, 98 L.Ed 405, and Hoiness v. United States, 335 U.S. 297, 69 S.Ct. 70, 93 L.Ed. 16, that reaches in to Firchau and Ruby. I do wonder how we shall hold when a plaintiff files his notice of appeal as an appendage to his original compla…
• Song Jook SUH v. Rosenberg, 437 F.2d 1098 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …s provide that they are to be construed ‘to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.’ Rule 1.” (Id. at 181-182, 83 S.Ct. at 229-230.) These comments are also applicable here. See also: United States v. Arizona, 1953, 346 U.S. 907, 74 S.Ct. 239, 98 L.Ed. 405, summarily reversing this Court’s decision reported at 206 F. 2d 159; Hoiness v. United States, 1948, 335 U.S. 297, 69 S.Ct. 70, 93 L.Ed. 16. United States v. Crescent Amusement Co., 1944, 323 U.S. 173, 65 S.Ct. 254, 89…
• Donovan v. Esso Shipping Co., 259 F.2d 65 (3d Cir. 1958)
  …the notice and where the defect has not materially misled the appellee. Railway Express Agency v. Epperson, 8 Cir., 1957, 240 F. 2d 189; Hoiness v. United States, 1948, 335 U.S. 297, 69 S.Ct. 70, 93 L.Ed. 16; United States v. State of Arizona, 1953, 346 U.S. 907, 74 S.Ct. 239, 98 L.Ed. 405, reversing 9 Cir., 1953, 206 F. 2d 159. For example, an appeal from the denial of a new trial may under exceptional circumstances be treated as an inept attempt to appeal from the judgment which preceded that denial. See…

Authorities Cited

• Hoiness v. United States, 335 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1948)