THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
THOMAS R. VARNEDOE, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1966-01-05
No. 34740
THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
181 So. 2d 523 Florida Supreme Court (1966)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court approved the Board of Governors' decision to accept a lawyer's resignation from The Florida Bar without leave for reinstatement, following an investigation into his conduct. The court found the Board's action to be a proper proposal in this cause.


Holding

Yes, the court found the Board of Governors' decision to accept the resignation without leave for reinstatement to be a proper proposal and approved it.


Key Quotes

“The Board of Governors, proceeding under Rule 11.09, Article XI, of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A., filed in this court its Judgment ordering the acceptance of the resignation from The Florida Bar, providing, however, that said resignation be without leave for reinstatement.”

Describes the action taken by the Board of Governors.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Thomas R. Varnedoe, facing an investigation by The Florida Bar, petitioned to resign without prejudice to future reinstatement. The Board of Governors…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent, Thomas R. Varnedoe, filed his petition with The Florida Bar requesting permission to resign from The Bar without prejudice to being reinstated at some future time. A letter was sent to each member of the Grievance Committee which had begun an investigation into respondent’s conduct and the matter was thereafter considered by the Board of Governors. The Board of Governors, proceeding under Rule 11.09, Article XI, of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A., filed in this court its Judgment ordering the acceptance of the resignation from The Florida Bar, providing, however, that said resignation be without leave for reinstatement.

More than thirty days have elapsed since the filing in this court of the Judgment of the Board of Governors and respondent has filed no petition for review thereof. Notice of the action of the Board of Governors was directed by registered mail to the respondent at his regular and last known address, but was returned by the United States Post Office marked “Moved, left no address”. Cf. State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Cheshire (Fla.1959), 112 So.2d 569. This court has duly considered the record and finds that the decision of the Board of Governors accepting respondent’s resignation without leave for reinstatement a proper proposal in this cause. Therefore, the action of the Board of Governors is approved and it is ordered that the name of Thomas R. Varnedoe be stricken from the list of those persons entitled to practice law in this state, without leave for reinstatement in the future.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw