UNITED STATES

v.

GILMAN

Citator

Cited By

• Alaska S.S. Co., Inc. v. Petterson, 347 U.S. 396 (U.S. 1954)
  …r determination of damages. 205 F. 2d 478. Because of an alleged conflict with Lopez v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co., 201 F. 2d 418, and the importance of the decision in relation to a shipowner’s liability for unseaworthiness, we granted certiorari. 346 U. S. 914. The doctrine of seaworthiness was stated as a settled proposition in The Osceola, 189 U. S. 158, 175, as follows: “That the vessel and her owner are, both by English and American law, liable to an indemnity for injuries received by seamen in cons…
• United States v. Borden Co., 347 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1954)
  …itor dairy company enjoined the conduct in question and made it “useless” to award the Government an injunction. Ill F. Supp. 562. The Government then appealed directly to this [*516] Court under 15 U. S. C. § 29, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 346 U. S. 914. Three of the four questions presented on this appeal deal with rulings by the district judge that certain evidence was inadmissible.4 The Government does not challenge the court’s conclusion that on the record conspiracy was not shown, but it insi…
• United States v. Gilman, 347 U.S. 507 (U.S. 1954)
  …entered judgment against the United States for $5,500 and judgment over for the United States in the same amount. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment against respondent by a divided vote. 206 F. 2d 846. The case is here on writ of certiorari. 346 U. S. 914. Petitioner’s argument is that the right of indemnity, though not expressly granted by the Tort Claims Act, is to be implied. A private employer, it is said, has a common-law right of indemnity against an employee whose negligence has made the empl…