CERVANTES

v.

BERGAN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Chessman v. Teets, 354 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1957)
  …that might be disclosed upon an adversary hearing focused squarely on the adequacy of the transcript, would not lead it to a different conclusion. Certainly this Court’s previous denials of certiorari, 340 U. S. 840 ; 341 U. S. 929; 343 U. S. 915; 346 U. S. 916; 348 U. S. 864, do not foreclose us from now granting appropriate relief. Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443. And it may be noted that it was not until the present proceedings in the District Court that the facts surrounding the settlement of the state c…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, 239 F.2d 205 (9th Cir. 1956)
  …(Minute entry, California Supreme Court), decided January 15, 1952. Writ of habeas corpus denied by [*210] district court on November 6, 1951. Chessman v. Duffy (D.C.Civ. 30965). . Chessman v. People', 9 Cir., 1953, 205 F. 2d 128, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 916, 74 S.Ct. 278, 98 L.Ed. 412; Chessman v. Teets, Crim. 5632 (Minute entry, Cal- - ifornia Supreme Court)' July 21, 1954; People v. Superior Court, Cal.App., 273 P. 2d 936; In re Chessman, 43 Cal.2d 391, 408, 274 P. 2d 645, certiorari denied Chessman…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Thomas v. Conemaugh & Black Lick R.R. Co., 234 F.2d 429 (3d Cir. 1956)
  …The questions related to technical problems which were particularly within the experience of the expert witnesses and beyond the knowledge of the average juror. See Sanders v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 3 Cir., 1953, 204 F. 2d 436, certiorari denied, 1953, 346 U.S. 916, 74 S.Ct. 278, 98 L. Ed. 411. We find that their submission was not prejudicial error. We find without basis defendant’s contention that the District Court CQm-mitted prejudicial error in its charge to the jury. We see no merit in the defendant’s c…