LEE

v.

TENNESSEE

Citator

Cited By

• Frand v. United States, 289 F.2d 693 (10th Cir. 1961)
  …683, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 860, 68 S.Ct. 1519, 92 L.Ed. 1780, rehearing denied 335 U.S. 839, 69 S.Ct. 8, 93 L.Ed. 390; Brink v. United States, 10 Cir., 202 F. 2d 4, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 1001, 73 S.Ct. 1147, 97 L.Ed. 1406, rehearing denied 346 U.S. 918, 74 S.Ct. 276, 98 L.Ed. 413; and Barber v. United States, 10 Cir., 227 F. 2d 431. In the case at bar the self-prepared petition alleges in substance that the court-appointed attorney told the accused that this was his first case; that he had never…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fred H. Johnson under the Will of Clay M. Thomas, 310 F.2d 550 (6th Cir. 1962)
  …n of matter outside the record was the Examiner’s and not the Board’s, thus differing from the situation as it existed before this court in National Labor Relations Board v. Bill Daniels, Inc., 202 F.2cl 579 (C.A.6, 1953), reversed on other grounds, 346 U.S. 918, 74 S.Ct. 305, 98 L.Ed. 413. The Board is not bound by the Examiner’s findings. It may disagree with them. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456. It is difficult to see how the Examiner’…
• Thornton Lee Handley v. Pitts, 623 F.2d 23 (6th Cir. 1980)
  ….) . Carroll v. State, 212 Tenn. 464, 370 S.W. 2d 523, 529-530 (1963); Lee v. State, 194 Tenn. 652, 254 S.W. 2d 747, cert. den., Lee v. State, 345 U.S. 1003, 73 S.Ct. 1145, 97 L.Ed. 1408, reh. den. 346 U.S. 843, 74 S.Ct. 18, 98 L.Ed. 363, reh. den. 346 U.S. 918, 74 S.Ct. 276, 98 L.Ed. 413 (1953); Goedel v. State, 567 S.W. 2d 180, 182-183 (Tenn.Cr.App.1978); Ellison v. State, 549 S.W. 2d 691, 694-697 (Tenn.Cr.App.1976). However, the cases cited were quite different from the instant case. These cases could m…