STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. V. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; AND FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION V. NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Williams v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 415 F.2d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …uel Corp. v. FPC, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 208, 224-225, 227, 163 F. 2d 433, 449-450, 452 (1947); South Carolina Generating Co. v. FPC, supra note 81, 249 F. 2d at 764; State Corp. Comm’n of Kansas v. FPC, 206 F. 2d 690, 722-723 (8th Cir. 1953), cert. denied 346 U.S. 922, 74 S.Ct. 307, 98 L.Ed. 416 (1954); and see the cases cited in note 82, supra. . See South Carolina Generating Co. v. FPC, supra note 81 (suspending Commission order and remanding for further explanation, because of apparent inconsistency in Commis…
• Consol. GAS Supply Corp. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 520 F.2d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …med. . 50 F.P.C. 1348 (1973). . Opinion and Order No. 671-A Denying Rehearing, 51 FPC 1014 (1974). . 11 F.P.C. 43 (1952). The Seaboard formula was approved in State Corporation Comm'n of Kansas v. FPC, 206 F. 2d 690 (8th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 922, 74 S.Ct. 307, 98 L.Ed. 416 (1954). . Memphis, a division of the City of Memphis, Tennessee, is a city-gate customer of Texas Gas Transmission Corp., a pipeline company that purchases a substantial portion of its gas from United. . Columbia and Co…
• Richmond Power & Light OF the City OF Richmond v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 574 F.2d 610 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …ic Seaboard Corp., 11 F.P.C. 43 (1952). Although this apportionment does not coincide with pure system-peak responsibility pricing it has garnered judicial approbation, State Corp. Comm’n v. FPC, 206 F. 2d 690, 709-710 (8th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 922, 74 S.Ct. 307, 98 L.Ed. 416 (1954), and has been generally followed for many years. The Commission’s justification of the resulting rate relies on fairness and value-of-service considerations. See Atlantic Seaboard Corp., supra, 11 F.P.C. at 53-56;…